How to Run Boltz-2

by Corin Wagen · Jun 6, 2025

Today, a team of researchers from MIT and Recursion released Boltz-2, an open-source protein–ligand co-folding model. Boltz-2 can not only predict the structure of biomolecular complexes from sequences, it also "approaches the accuracy of FEP-based methods" at protein–ligand binding-affinity prediction (source).

In a set of binding-affinity benchmarks, the authors show that Boltz-2 performs almost as well as the industry-standard free-energy perturbation workflow and handily outperforms cheaper physics-based methods like MM/PBSA, although performance is considerably worse on internal targets from Recursion:

Comparison of Boltz-2 to other methods.

Figure 6 from the Boltz-2 paper.

While full assessment of Boltz-2's capabilities will require extensive benchmarking and external verification, it's already possible for scientists to start using Boltz-2 for their own projects. In this post, we provide step-by-step guides on how to run Boltz-2 locally and through Rowan's computational-chemistry platform.

(Curious about how Boltz-2 works? Check out this FAQ to learn more about what the model's trained on, where it can be useful, and where it still has limitations.)

Running Locally

1. Install Boltz-2

Boltz-2 is an open-source model and can be installed from the Python Package Index. You can install this any number of ways; we like using pixi for dependency management.

pixi init
pixi add python=3.12
pixi add --pypi boltz

2. Create a Template .yaml File

Boltz-2 requires a specific input-file syntax. The authors provide several examples in their GitHub repository; here's the example .yaml file for predicting protein–ligand binding affinity.

version: 1  # Optional, defaults to 1
sequences:
  - protein:
      id: A
      sequence: MVTPEGNVSLVDESLLVGVTDEDRAVRSAHQFYERLIGLWAPAVMEAAHELGVFAALAEAPADSGELARRLDCDARAMRVLLDALYAYDVIDRIHDTNGFRYLLSAEARECLLPGTLFSLVGKFMHDINVAWPAWRNLAEVVRHGARDTSGAESPNGIAQEDYESLVGGINFWAPPIVTTLSRKLRASGRSGDATASVLDVGCGTGLYSQLLLREFPRWTATGLDVERIATLANAQALRLGVEERFATRAGDFWRGGWGTGYDLVLFANIFHLQTPASAVRLMRHAAACLAPDGLVAVVDQIVDADREPKTPQDRFALLFAASMTNTGGGDAYTFQEYEEWFTAAGLQRIETLDTPMHRILLARRATEPSAVPEGQASENLYFQ
  - ligand:
      id: B
      smiles: 'N[C@@H](Cc1ccc(O)cc1)C(=O)O'
properties:
  - affinity:
      binder: B

Boltz-2 does not yet support protein–protein binding affinity or predicting binding affinity for multiple ligands.

3. Run Boltz-2 Locally

To run Boltz-2, initialize the environment shell and then use boltz predict to run the model.

pixi shell
boltz predict affinity.yaml --use_msa_server

This call will take a little while to run; make sure your computer has enough disk space to download the model weights! When finished, Boltz-2 will write a bunch of directories and .json files containing predictions. The predictions will be located in output/predictions/[input-file]/affinity-[input-file].json, and will contain predicted IC50 values (in micromolar) and binary probability that the compound is a binder.

Boltz-2 is a complex package and this guide barely scratches the surface. For a full guide to running prediction with Boltz-2, see the authors' documentation.

Running Through Rowan

To quickly use Boltz-2 for binding-affinity prediction, calculations can also be run through Rowan. Creating an account on Rowan is completely free and can be done using any Google-managed email account; create an account here.

1. Choose Workflow

Selecting the protein-ligand co-Folding workflow.

Once you sign in to Rowan, you can select which workflow you want to run. Here, we'll select the "Protein–Ligand Co-Folding" workflow (towards the bottom of the screen).

2. Enter Protein and Ligand

Inputting a sucrose molecule.

Proteins can be specified by sequence; existing protein structures in Rowan won't work, because this is co-folding—we don't want to start with a 3D structure.

Molecules can be loaded into Rowan by name, by SMILES, by input file, or through our provided 2D and 3D editors. Here, we'll input the molecule from the above demo by SMILES.

3. Run Calculation

The finished calculation results.

Once you click "Submit Calculation," we'll allocate a cloud GPU and start running Boltz-2 on your system. The calculations should be done in a few minutes and can be viewed through the browser.

Rowan displays the predicted protein–ligand complex through our 3D viewer, with predicted binding affinity and confidence metrics on the side. The complex can be downloaded as a PDB file for further analysis.

Banner background image

What to Read Next

Improving Rowan's API

Improving Rowan's API

API as a coequal interface to Rowan's product; what we're changing in v3.0.0 of rowan-python; typed outputs; new workflow API; more agent-friendly features; acknowledging our early partners here
Mar 19, 2026 · Eli Mann, Corin Wagen, Jonathon Vandezande, and Spencer Schneider
Building Modern AI-Enabled Infrastructure for Pharma: A Conversation with Anthony Bradley from Dalton

Building Modern AI-Enabled Infrastructure for Pharma: A Conversation with Anthony Bradley from Dalton

Corin talks with Anthony about the real problems in computer-assisted drug discovery, how to sell software to pharma, and what Dalton can learn from Nike.
Mar 17, 2026 · Corin Wagen
Free-Energy Perturbation

Free-Energy Perturbation

what FEP is and why it's useful; limitations of current methods; Rowan FEP, TMD, and public benchmarks; how to run FEP in Rowan; the dream of FEP "too cheap to meter"; how to try Rowan FEP
Mar 4, 2026 · Corin Wagen, Eli Mann, Ari Wagen, and Spencer Schenider
Free-Energy Perturbation: A Pedagogical Introduction

Free-Energy Perturbation: A Pedagogical Introduction

Learn the core concepts behind free energy perturbation (FEP) using interactive 1D toy systems with exact analytical results.
Mar 4, 2026 · Corin Wagen
Solvent-Dependent Conformer Search

Solvent-Dependent Conformer Search

a good conformer is hard to find; clustering and the ReSCoSS workflow; Rowan's implementation, with some expert help; a demonstration on maraviroc
Feb 26, 2026 · Corin Wagen and Ari Wagen
How to Predict Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity

How to Predict Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity

A comparison of seven different approaches to predicting binding affinity.
Feb 13, 2026 · Corin Wagen
SAPT, Protein Preparation, and Starling-Based Microscopic pKa

SAPT, Protein Preparation, and Starling-Based Microscopic pKa

interaction energy decomposition w/ SAPT0 & a warning; making protein preparation more granular; catching forcefield errors earlier; microscopic pKa via Starling; internship applications now open
Feb 12, 2026 · Corin Wagen, Jonathon Vandezande, Ari Wagen, and Eli Mann
Credits FAQ

Credits FAQ

How credits work, why Rowan tracks usage with credits, and how these numbers translate into real-world workflows.
Feb 9, 2026 · Corin Wagen and Ari Wagen
Analogue Docking, Protein MD, Multiple Co-Folding Samples, Speed Estimates, and 2FA

Analogue Docking, Protein MD, Multiple Co-Folding Samples, Speed Estimates, and 2FA

docking analogues to a template; running MD on proteins w/o ligands; generating multiple structures with Boltz & Chai; runtime estimates & dispatch information; two-factor authentication; speedups
Jan 28, 2026 · Corin Wagen, Ari Wagen, and Spencer Schneider
Predicting Permeability for Small Molecules

Predicting Permeability for Small Molecules

why permeability matters; different experimental and computational approaches; Rowan's supported methods; an example script
Jan 9, 2026 · Corin Wagen, Eli Mann, and Ari Wagen